Lesson 5.7: Final Assessment - ISO 42001 AI Management Systems
Introduction
Congratulations on completing the ISO 42001 training course! This final assessment tests your comprehensive understanding of AI Management Systems and ISO 42001 requirements. The assessment covers all modules and prepares you for real-world AIMS implementation and certification.
Assessment Format:
- 35 comprehensive questions covering all modules
- Multiple choice and scenario-based questions
- Passing score: 80% (28 correct answers)
- Detailed explanations for each answer
- Unlimited attempts to achieve passing score
Assessment Instructions
- Read each question carefully
- Select the best answer from the options provided
- Some questions have multiple correct aspects - choose the MOST complete or appropriate answer
- Scenario questions require applying knowledge to practical situations
- Review the explanations after completing the assessment to reinforce learning
Module 1: Introduction to AI Management Systems
Question 1
What is the PRIMARY purpose of ISO 42001?
A) To ensure all AI systems achieve 100% accuracy B) To provide a framework for responsible development and use of AI systems C) To replace existing quality management systems in organizations using AI D) To mandate specific AI technologies that must be used
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 provides a management system framework for the responsible development and use of AI systems. It doesn't prescribe specific accuracy levels (A), replace other management systems but can integrate with them (C), or mandate specific technologies (D). The standard focuses on governance, risk management, and responsible AI practices throughout the AI lifecycle.
Question 2
Which of the following is NOT one of the key benefits of implementing ISO 42001?
A) Enhanced stakeholder trust and confidence B) Guaranteed AI system accuracy of at least 95% C) Systematic risk management approach D) Improved regulatory compliance
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 does not guarantee specific accuracy levels for AI systems. Benefits include enhanced trust (A), systematic risk management (C), and improved compliance (D). The standard requires organizations to define appropriate performance criteria for their context, but doesn't mandate specific accuracy thresholds.
Question 3
ISO 42001 is based on which established management system structure?
A) ITIL framework B) COBIT framework C) ISO High-Level Structure (Annex SL) D) TOGAF architecture framework
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: ISO 42001 follows the ISO High-Level Structure (Annex SL), which provides a common framework for all ISO management system standards. This structure includes clauses 1-10 covering scope, references, terms, context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement. This enables easier integration with other ISO standards like ISO 27001 and ISO 9001.
Module 2: AI Fundamentals and Risk Management
Question 4
In the context of AI ethics and ISO 42001, what does "fairness" primarily address?
A) Equal computational resources allocated to all models B) Non-discrimination and equitable treatment across different groups C) Fair pricing for AI services D) Equal training time for all AI systems
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Fairness in AI ethics primarily concerns non-discrimination and equitable treatment across different demographic groups. It ensures AI systems don't produce biased outcomes that disproportionately harm protected groups. Options A, C, and D relate to resource allocation, pricing, or training, which are operational concerns rather than ethical fairness.
Question 5
A company's AI chatbot sometimes provides incorrect medical advice. According to ISO 42001 risk management principles, what should be the FIRST step?
A) Immediately shut down the chatbot permanently B) Conduct a thorough risk assessment including likelihood and impact C) Increase the chatbot's training data by 50% D) Switch to a different AI algorithm
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 emphasizes systematic risk management. The first step is to conduct a thorough risk assessment to understand the likelihood and impact of the incorrect advice. Based on this assessment, appropriate risk treatment can be determined. Immediately shutting down (A) may be premature, while increasing training data (C) or switching algorithms (D) are potential treatments that should be determined after proper risk assessment.
Question 6
Which of the following is an example of a "bias in data" issue?
A) The AI model takes too long to process requests B) Historical hiring data used for training reflects past discriminatory practices C) The AI system requires expensive hardware to run D) The model's accuracy decreases over time
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Bias in data occurs when training data reflects historical prejudices or unequal representation. Historical hiring data with discriminatory patterns (B) is a classic example. Processing speed (A), hardware costs (C), and accuracy degradation (D) are performance or operational issues, not data bias.
Question 7
In ISO 42001 risk assessment, a risk with "likelihood = 4" and "impact = 5" would typically be classified as:
A) Low risk requiring monitoring only B) Medium risk requiring standard controls C) High risk requiring specific treatment plan D) Critical risk requiring immediate senior management attention
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: Using a 5x5 risk matrix where risk level = likelihood × impact, a 4×5 = 20 score is in the critical range (typically 16-25). Critical risks require immediate senior management attention and urgent treatment. Low risks (1-3) require monitoring, medium risks (4-8) need standard controls, and high risks (9-15) require treatment plans.
Module 3: ISO 42001 Requirements
Question 8
According to ISO 42001 Clause 4.3, what must be documented regarding the AIMS scope?
A) Only the AI systems covered B) Boundaries, applicability, and justified exclusions C) Just the organizational units involved D) Only the geographic locations
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 4.3 requires the AIMS scope to document boundaries and applicability (what's included), any exclusions, and justification for those exclusions. A comprehensive scope includes AI systems, organizational units, locations, and interested parties, but most importantly must clearly define what's in and out of scope with justified exclusions.
Question 9
What is the MINIMUM frequency for management review required by ISO 42001?
A) Monthly B) Quarterly C) Planned intervals (no specific frequency mandated) D) Annually
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 9.3 requires management review at "planned intervals" but doesn't mandate a specific frequency. Organizations determine appropriate frequency based on their context, risk level, and maturity. While quarterly or annual reviews are common, the standard allows flexibility. The key is that reviews occur regularly as planned.
Question 10
Which of the following is a MANDATORY input to management review according to ISO 42001?
A) Customer satisfaction survey results B) Results of risk assessments C) Financial performance data D) Market share analysis
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 9.3 explicitly requires management review to consider results of risk assessments as a mandatory input. While customer feedback (A) is a required input, "satisfaction survey results" specifically is just one method. Financial performance (C) and market share (D) are not mandatory management review inputs in the standard.
Question 11
An organization has 5 AI systems: 2 high-risk, 2 medium-risk, and 1 low-risk. For internal audits, which approach BEST aligns with ISO 42001 principles?
A) Audit all systems equally once per year B) Audit high-risk systems more frequently than medium and low-risk systems C) Only audit high-risk systems to save resources D) Audit systems randomly without considering risk
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 9.2 requires the audit program to consider the importance of processes and previous audit results. Risk-based auditing means high-risk systems receive more frequent audits. Option A doesn't differentiate by risk, C neglects medium/low-risk systems entirely, and D ignores risk-based principles altogether.
Question 12
What is required for documented information according to ISO 42001 Clause 7.5?
A) All documents must be in PDF format B) Version control, approval, and accessibility C) Documents must be printed and filed physically D) Only electronic storage is acceptable
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 7.5 requires documented information to be appropriately identified (version control), stored and protected, and controlled for distribution and access. The standard doesn't mandate specific formats (A), require physical filing (C), or require only electronic storage (D). The focus is on control, not format.
Module 4: Implementing an AIMS
Question 13
When establishing an AIMS, what should be the FIRST step?
A) Write all policies and procedures B) Purchase AI governance software C) Conduct a gap analysis against ISO 42001 requirements D) Hire an external consultant
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The first step in AIMS implementation should be understanding your current state through gap analysis. This identifies what you have versus what ISO 42001 requires, enabling effective planning. Writing policies (A), purchasing software (B), or hiring consultants (D) should come after understanding your gaps and needs.
Question 14
A small startup with 3 AI developers wants to implement ISO 42001. They should:
A) Wait until they have at least 50 employees B) Scale the AIMS implementation to their size and complexity C) Implement the exact same AIMS as large enterprises D) Skip ISO 42001 as it's only for large companies
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 is scalable to any organization size. Small organizations should implement an AIMS appropriate to their size, complexity, and risk profile. They don't need to wait to grow (A), implement enterprise-scale systems (C), or skip the standard (D). A smaller organization will have simpler, more streamlined processes, but still conforming to requirements.
Question 15
What is "model drift" and why is it important for ISO 42001 implementation?
A) Physical movement of AI hardware, important for asset management B) Degradation of AI model performance over time, requiring monitoring per Clause 9.1 C) Team members leaving AI projects, important for resource management D) Changes in AI algorithms, important for version control
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Model drift refers to degradation in AI model performance over time due to changes in data patterns or environment. ISO 42001 Clause 9.1 requires monitoring and measurement of AI system performance. Detecting and addressing model drift through ongoing monitoring is essential for maintaining AIMS effectiveness. Options A, C, and D describe different issues unrelated to model drift.
Question 16
An AI impact assessment should be conducted:
A) Only once before initial deployment B) Only if an incident occurs C) Before deployment and when significant changes occur D) Only for high-risk AI systems
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 6.1.2 requires AI impact assessments before deployment and when significant changes occur. Assessments should be reviewed and updated as the system or its context changes. Conducting only once (A) misses changes over time, waiting for incidents (B) is reactive, and limiting to high-risk systems only (D) ignores that risk levels can change.
Question 17
Which role is ultimately accountable for the AIMS?
A) AI Director B) Quality Manager C) Top Management D) Chief Information Security Officer
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 5.1 places ultimate accountability for the AIMS with top management. While AI Directors, Quality Managers, and other roles have important responsibilities for AIMS operation, top management must demonstrate leadership and commitment and is ultimately accountable for the system's effectiveness.
Module 5: Certification Journey
Question 18
During a Stage 1 certification audit, the auditor finds that your risk assessment procedure is documented but no risk assessments have been conducted. This is likely:
A) Acceptable since documentation exists B) A minor nonconformity C) A major nonconformity D) An observation only
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: This indicates a complete absence of a required process (risk assessment) despite documentation existing. This represents a major nonconformity—documentation without implementation. A minor NC (B) would be isolated lapses. An observation (D) is not a nonconformity. The gap between documented procedure and complete lack of implementation suggests systemic failure, not just missing documentation (A).
Question 19
What is the primary difference between Stage 1 and Stage 2 certification audits?
A) Stage 1 is on-site, Stage 2 is remote B) Stage 1 reviews documentation and readiness, Stage 2 verifies implementation C) Stage 1 is optional, Stage 2 is mandatory D) Stage 1 takes longer than Stage 2
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Stage 1 focuses on documentation review and readiness assessment, while Stage 2 is the comprehensive implementation audit verifying conformity. Stage 1 can be on-site or remote (A), both stages are required (C), and Stage 2 typically takes longer (D is incorrect).
Question 20
How often are surveillance audits typically conducted after initial ISO 42001 certification?
A) Monthly B) Quarterly C) Annually D) Every 3 years
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: Surveillance audits are typically conducted annually during the 3-year certification cycle (Year 1 and Year 2). At the end of Year 3, a recertification audit occurs. Monthly (A) and quarterly (B) are too frequent for surveillance, while every 3 years (D) would only be the recertification schedule.
Question 21
Your organization received a major nonconformity during certification audit. What happens next?
A) Certificate is denied permanently B) You must address the NC and may need a re-audit before certification C) Certificate is issued with conditions D) The NC is automatically waived
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Major nonconformities must be addressed before certification can be granted. The organization develops and implements corrective actions, and a re-audit may be required to verify resolution. Certificates aren't denied permanently (A)—organizations can reapply after addressing issues. Certificates with conditions (C) apply to minor NCs. Major NCs are never automatically waived (D).
Question 22
During a surveillance audit, the auditor wants to review AI systems deployed in the last 6 months. You should:
A) Refuse because those systems weren't included in initial certification B) Provide the information as surveillance covers the continuing AIMS C) Only show documentation for systems approved before initial certification D) Request a separate audit for new systems
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Surveillance audits verify continued conformity of the entire AIMS, including new AI systems developed/deployed since certification. The certification covers the AIMS as a whole, not specific AI systems. Refusing (A), limiting scope (C), or requesting separate audits (D) misunderstand the nature of AIMS certification.
Question 23
What is the typical validity period for an ISO 42001 certificate?
A) 1 year B) 2 years C) 3 years D) 5 years
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: ISO management system certificates, including ISO 42001, are typically valid for 3 years. During this period, annual surveillance audits verify continued conformity. At the end of 3 years, a recertification audit is required to renew the certificate for another 3-year period.
Question 24
An organization's certificate can be suspended if:
A) They change their logo B) They have a major nonconformity that is not addressed C) They hire new AI engineers D) They upgrade their AI technology
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Certificate suspension occurs when major nonconformities are not addressed, there's systematic AIMS breakdown, or the organization refuses to cooperate with auditors. Changing logos (A), hiring staff (C), or upgrading technology (D) are normal business activities that don't trigger suspension, though significant changes should be communicated to the certification body.
Scenario-Based Questions
Scenario 1: Healthcare AI System
Context: MedTech Inc. is developing an AI system to assist radiologists in detecting lung cancer from X-rays. The system will recommend which images require closer examination by specialists.
Question 25
What risk level would this AI system likely be classified as?
A) Low risk - it's just assisting doctors B) Medium risk - it involves medical data C) High risk - it impacts health diagnoses and treatment decisions D) Minimal risk - doctors make final decisions
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: Despite being assistive, this system influences critical health decisions and could lead to missed diagnoses if it fails. Under frameworks like the EU AI Act and ISO 42001 risk principles, AI systems for medical diagnosis are typically classified as high-risk due to potential impact on patient safety, even with human oversight. The "assisting" nature (A) doesn't reduce the risk level, and while medical data privacy (B) is important, the diagnostic impact is the primary risk factor.
Question 26
For this healthcare AI system, which of the following is MOST critical to include in the AI impact assessment?
A) The color scheme of the user interface B) Potential for diagnostic errors (false negatives/positives) across patient demographics C) The programming language used D) The brand of hardware running the system
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The AI impact assessment must focus on potential harms and ethical considerations. For a diagnostic system, error rates and their distribution across patient demographics (potential bias) are critical as they directly affect patient outcomes. UI design (A), programming language (C), and hardware brand (D) are technical implementation details that don't address the core impacts and risks the assessment should evaluate.
Question 27
MedTech's AI system shows 95% accuracy overall but only 87% accuracy for patients over 70. What should be the appropriate response under ISO 42001?
A) Accept the results since 87% is still high accuracy B) Investigate the cause, assess if this represents unfair bias, and take corrective action if needed C) Remove patients over 70 from the target population D) Lower the overall accuracy target to match
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 requires fairness assessment and addressing potential discrimination. A significant accuracy gap across age groups suggests potential bias that could lead to harm. The appropriate response is to investigate root causes (data imbalance, feature selection, etc.), assess fairness implications, and take corrective action such as retraining with balanced data or implementing compensating controls. Simply accepting (A), excluding a population (C), or lowering standards (D) don't address the fairness issue.
Scenario 2: Financial Services AI
Context: FinServe Bank has implemented an AI system for credit scoring and loan approval recommendations. The system processes 1,000 applications daily.
Question 28
The bank discovers their training data comes from 2010-2015 and may not reflect current economic conditions. According to ISO 42001, what should they do?
A) Continue using the system since it passed initial testing B) Assess the risk of outdated data, test current performance, and retrain if needed C) Immediately shut down the system D) Add a disclaimer to customers about data age
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 requires ongoing risk assessment and monitoring (Clauses 6.1 and 9.1). Outdated training data could cause model drift and poor performance in current conditions. The appropriate response is to assess the risk, evaluate current performance through testing, and retrain the model if performance has degraded. Continuing without assessment (A) ignores risk management, immediate shutdown (C) may be premature without assessment, and disclaimers (D) don't address the underlying issue.
Question 29
FinServe wants to ensure human oversight of the AI loan system. Which approach BEST aligns with ISO 42001 Clause 8.5?
A) Humans review 100% of loan decisions made by AI B) Humans can override AI recommendations, with clear criteria and logging of overrides C) Humans only review when customers complain D) AI makes all decisions autonomously to ensure consistency
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 8.5 requires appropriate human oversight. Option B represents "human-on-the-loop" oversight where humans can intervene when needed, with proper governance (criteria and logging). Reviewing 100% (A) negates the efficiency benefit of AI, reactive-only review (C) is insufficient oversight, and fully autonomous decisions (D) don't provide the required human oversight for high-stakes decisions.
Question 30
During internal audit, the auditor finds that loan decisions and their rationales are not being logged. This violates which ISO 42001 principle?
A) Competence B) Transparency and accountability C) Resource management D) Strategic planning
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Logging decisions and rationales is essential for transparency (understanding how decisions are made) and accountability (being able to review and explain decisions). This relates to documented information (Clause 7.5) and monitoring (Clause 9.1) requirements. Lack of decision logging undermines the ability to audit, explain, or challenge decisions—core aspects of accountability.
Scenario 3: E-Commerce AI
Context: ShopNow.com uses an AI recommendation engine to suggest products to customers based on browsing and purchase history.
Question 31
ShopNow's recommendation AI is updated weekly with new models. According to ISO 42001, what should be in place?
A) No special requirements since it's low risk B) Change management process with testing, approval, and documentation C) Customer approval for each model update D) Complete system shutdown during updates
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 8.1 requires operational planning and control, including change management. Frequent model updates require a controlled process ensuring changes are tested, approved, and documented. Even for lower-risk systems, changes should be managed to prevent issues. No special requirements (A) ignores the need for control, customer approval (C) is impractical, and shutdown (D) is unnecessary with proper change management.
Question 32
ShopNow wants to use customer demographic data (age, gender) to improve recommendations. What should they consider under ISO 42001?
A) Only the technical implementation B) Privacy impact, fairness assessment, legal compliance, and transparency to customers C) Just obtaining customer consent D) The cost of additional data storage
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Using demographic data triggers multiple ISO 42001 considerations: privacy impact assessment (Clause 6.1.2), fairness assessment to prevent discrimination (ethics), legal compliance with data protection laws, and transparency to customers about data use. Technical implementation (A) alone is insufficient, consent (C) is just one aspect of privacy, and storage costs (D) are operational concerns that don't address the governance requirements.
Question 33
ShopNow's recommendation system occasionally promotes out-of-stock items. From an ISO 42001 perspective, this represents:
A) A minor operational issue requiring no action B) A performance issue requiring monitoring and corrective action C) A compliance violation requiring audit D) A security breach requiring incident response
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: This is a performance and quality issue affecting customer experience and system effectiveness. ISO 42001 Clause 9.1 requires monitoring system performance, and Clause 10.1 requires corrective action for issues. While not a severe problem, it should be addressed through root cause analysis and corrective action to improve AIMS effectiveness. It's not insignificant (A), not a compliance violation (C), and not a security breach (D).
Scenario 4: Manufacturing AI
Context: AutoMake Industries uses AI for predictive maintenance of factory equipment, predicting when machines need servicing to prevent breakdowns.
Question 34
AutoMake's AI system has prevented 50 breakdowns but failed to predict 5 breakdowns that occurred. How should this be addressed in the AIMS?
A) Success rate is high, no action needed B) Analyze the 5 failures, identify root causes, and implement improvements C) Shut down the AI system as it's unreliable D) Hide the failures to maintain confidence in the system
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: ISO 42001 Clause 10.2 requires continual improvement. The 5 failures represent learning opportunities. Analyzing root causes (were they different types of failures? data quality issues? model limitations?) can lead to improvements. While the success rate is good (A), improvement opportunities shouldn't be ignored. Shutdown (C) is extreme, and hiding failures (D) violates transparency and prevents learning.
Question 35
AutoMake wants to extend their predictive maintenance AI to a new factory with different equipment. What should they do under ISO 42001?
A) Deploy immediately since the AI is already proven B) Conduct risk assessment, validate performance on new equipment, and update documentation C) Wait 6 months to observe new equipment manually first D) Train completely new AI model from scratch
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: Significant changes in deployment context (new equipment types) require risk assessment to identify new risks, validation testing to ensure the AI performs adequately on new equipment, and documentation updates. Immediate deployment (A) ignores potential differences, excessive waiting (C) delays benefits unnecessarily, and training from scratch (D) may be overkill—transfer learning or adaptation might be sufficient depending on equipment similarity.
Assessment Scoring Guide
Scoring:
- 35 questions total
- Each question worth 1 point
- Passing score: 28/35 (80%)
Score Interpretation:
- 32-35 (91-100%): Excellent - Comprehensive understanding of ISO 42001
- 28-31 (80-90%): Good - Solid understanding, ready for AIMS implementation
- 24-27 (69-79%): Fair - Basic understanding, recommend review of missed topics
- Below 24 (<69%): Needs Improvement - Review course materials and retake
Areas of Focus by Score Range
If you scored 24-27:
Review these key areas:
- Risk Assessment: Ensure you understand risk classification and treatment
- Management Review: Review required inputs and outputs
- Audit Process: Understand Stage 1 vs Stage 2 and finding classification
- Documentation Requirements: Know what must be documented
If you scored below 24:
Focus on:
- Core ISO 42001 Structure: Review all 10 clauses and their requirements
- AI Risk Concepts: Understanding of fairness, bias, transparency, accountability
- AIMS Implementation: How to actually build and operate an AIMS
- Certification Process: Complete understanding of the certification journey
Post-Assessment Recommendations
For All Learners:
- Review Explanations: Read explanations for all questions, not just missed ones
- Practical Application: Apply learning to your organization's context
- Documentation Practice: Start drafting AIMS documents using provided templates
- Continued Learning: Stay current with ISO 42001 updates and AI governance trends
Next Steps Based on Your Goal:
If Implementing AIMS:
- Conduct gap analysis for your organization
- Develop implementation roadmap
- Engage stakeholders and secure resources
- Start with high-priority areas
If Preparing for Certification:
- Ensure 3-6 months operational evidence
- Conduct thorough internal audits
- Address any nonconformities
- Engage certification body
If Supporting AIMS:
- Understand your role and responsibilities
- Familiarize yourself with relevant procedures
- Participate in AIMS activities
- Contribute to continuous improvement
If Auditing AIMS:
- Develop detailed audit checklists
- Practice evidence gathering techniques
- Understand finding classification
- Build expertise in AI technology and risks
Certification of Completion
Upon achieving 80% or higher on this assessment, you have demonstrated comprehensive understanding of:
✓ ISO 42001 standard structure and requirements ✓ AI risk management and ethical considerations ✓ AIMS implementation methodology ✓ Documentation and control requirements ✓ Internal audit and management review processes ✓ Certification audit process and requirements ✓ Practical application of ISO 42001 principles
You are now prepared to:
- Implement an AI Management System in your organization
- Contribute effectively to AIMS operations
- Conduct internal AIMS audits
- Prepare for ISO 42001 certification
- Support responsible AI governance
Final Words
Congratulations on completing the ISO 42001 training course! You've gained comprehensive knowledge of AI Management Systems and are equipped to implement responsible AI governance in your organization.
Remember:
- ISO 42001 is not just about compliance—it's about responsible, ethical AI that benefits people and society
- Start small and scale—you don't need everything perfect from day one
- Learn continuously—AI and governance practices evolve rapidly
- Collaborate—AI governance requires diverse perspectives
- Focus on value—an effective AIMS creates business value, not just certification
Resources for Continued Learning:
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023 standard (official text)
- ISO/IEC 23894 (AI Risk Management)
- Industry associations and working groups
- AI ethics research and publications
- Regulatory guidance documents
We wish you success in your AI governance journey!
Retake Information
If you didn't achieve 80% on your first attempt:
- Review the course: Revisit lessons where you missed questions
- Focus on weak areas: Use the scoring guide to identify focus areas
- Study explanations: Understand WHY answers are correct
- Take your time: There's no time limit on the assessment
- Retake when ready: Unlimited attempts available
Your success in implementing responsible AI management matters—take the time needed to build comprehensive understanding.
End of Assessment
Return to course dashboard to view your score and certificate of completion (if passed).