Control Implementation Checklist
This comprehensive checklist maps all ISO 42001 Annex A controls to practical implementation steps. Use this as your roadmap for implementing a complete AI management system.
How to Use This Checklist
- Assessment: Check your current state for each control
- Prioritization: Focus on high-risk areas and mandatory controls first
- Planning: Create implementation plan with timelines and owners
- Execution: Implement controls systematically
- Validation: Verify each control is working effectively
- Documentation: Document implementation and evidence
- Monitoring: Continuously monitor control effectiveness
- Improvement: Refine and enhance based on experience
Control Status Legend
- ā Not Started: Control not yet implemented
- š In Progress: Implementation underway
- ā Implemented: Control in place
- ā Verified: Control tested and validated
- š Audit Ready: Documentation complete
ISO 42001 ANNEX A CONTROLS
A.1 AI SYSTEM INVENTORY
Objective: Maintain comprehensive inventory of all AI systems
A.1.1 AI System Identification and Documentation
Requirements: ā Inventory of all AI systems established ā Each AI system has unique identifier ā System owner identified for each AI system ā AI system classification (risk level) ā Inventory updated regularly
Implementation Steps:
-
Create Inventory Framework ā Define what constitutes an "AI system" in your organization ā Create inventory template with required fields ā Establish unique naming/numbering convention ā Set up inventory management system (spreadsheet, database, or tool)
-
Identify All AI Systems ā Survey all departments for AI systems ā Include deployed, in development, and pilot systems ā Include third-party AI services ā Document shadow AI (unauthorized AI use)
-
Document Each System ā System name and identifier ā Description and purpose ā Business owner and technical owner ā Risk classification (low/medium/high) ā Deployment status (dev/staging/production/retired) ā User base (internal/external, volume) ā Data sources and types ā Technology stack ā Regulatory applicability (EU AI Act, etc.) ā Integration points ā Deployment date and version
-
Establish Update Process ā Define update frequency (monthly recommended) ā Assign responsibility for updates ā Create change notification process ā Implement version control ā Archive retired systems
Inventory Template:
AI System ID: [AI-SYS-001]
System Name: [Customer Churn Prediction Model]
Business Owner: [Name, Department]
Technical Owner: [Name, Team]
Risk Level: [High/Medium/Low]
Status: [Production]
Description: [Brief description]
Purpose: [Business purpose]
Users: [Internal - Sales team, ~200 users]
Data Sources: [CRM, Transaction DB]
Data Types: [Customer data, PII]
Technology: [Python, XGBoost, AWS SageMaker]
Regulations: [GDPR, EU AI Act - High Risk]
Deployed: [2024-06-15]
Version: [2.1.0]
Last Review: [2025-12-01]
Next Review: [2026-03-01]
Evidence: ā AI System Inventory document ā Regular update logs ā Owner acknowledgments
ISO 42001 Reference: Clause 4.4, A.1
A.2 DATA GOVERNANCE
Objective: Ensure high-quality, compliant data management for AI
A.2.1 Data Management Framework
Requirements: ā Data governance framework established ā Data quality requirements defined ā Data roles and responsibilities assigned ā Data policies and procedures documented
Implementation Steps:
-
Establish Data Governance Organization ā Appoint Chief Data Officer or equivalent ā Create Data Governance Board ā Assign Data Stewards for key domains ā Define Data Engineer roles ā Establish Data Quality team
-
Define Data Quality Standards ā Accuracy requirements (target: >95%) ā Completeness requirements (target: <5% missing) ā Consistency requirements (100%) ā Timeliness requirements (define by use case) ā Validity requirements (100% schema compliance)
-
Create Data Policies ā Data quality policy ā Data access policy ā Data retention and deletion policy ā Data classification policy ā Data sharing policy
-
Implement Data Quality Processes ā Data profiling procedures ā Data validation rules ā Data quality monitoring ā Data quality issue resolution ā Data quality reporting
Evidence: ā Data Governance Framework document ā Data quality standards ā Data policies ā Organizational chart with data roles
A.2.2 Data Provenance and Lineage
Requirements: ā Data sources documented ā Data lineage tracked ā Data transformations recorded ā Data versioning implemented
Implementation Steps:
-
Document Data Sources ā Identify all data sources ā Document collection methods ā Record legal basis for collection ā Track source system owners
-
Implement Lineage Tracking ā Select lineage tool (Apache Atlas, DataHub, etc.) ā Configure automated lineage capture ā Document manual processes ā Track data transformations ā Record data consumers
-
Version Control ā Implement data versioning system (DVC, etc.) ā Tag datasets with versions ā Document version changes ā Maintain version history
Evidence: ā Data lineage diagrams ā Data source documentation ā Versioned datasets
A.2.3 Data Cataloging
Requirements: ā Data catalog established ā Metadata managed ā Data discoverable ā Data usage tracked
Implementation Steps:
-
Deploy Data Catalog ā Select catalog tool (Alation, Collibra, DataHub, etc.) ā Configure catalog infrastructure ā Define metadata standards ā Train users on catalog
-
Catalog All Datasets ā Add datasets to catalog ā Document schema and structure ā Add business descriptions ā Tag with classifications ā Link to lineage ā Record quality metrics
-
Maintain Catalog ā Regular updates process ā User feedback mechanism ā Usage analytics ā Quality improvements
Evidence: ā Data catalog with entries for all AI datasets ā Catalog usage reports ā User training records
A.2.4 Data Access Controls
Requirements: ā Access controls implemented ā Least privilege principle applied ā Access regularly reviewed ā Access audit logs maintained
Implementation Steps:
-
Classify Data ā Define classification levels (Public, Internal, Confidential, Restricted) ā Classify all datasets ā Document classification rationale
-
Implement Access Controls ā Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) ā Authentication (MFA required) ā Authorization rules ā Encryption (in transit and at rest) ā Data masking for non-production
-
Access Request Process ā Define request procedure ā Approval workflow ā Time-limited access ā Access recertification (quarterly)
-
Monitor and Audit ā Access logging enabled ā Anomaly detection ā Regular access reviews ā Compliance reporting
Evidence: ā Data classification matrix ā Access control policy ā Access logs ā Access review reports
ISO 42001 Reference: A.2
A.3 TRAINING DATA MANAGEMENT
Objective: Ensure training data is representative, unbiased, and high-quality
A.3.1 Training Data Selection and Quality
Requirements: ā Training data selection criteria defined ā Data quality validated ā Representativeness assessed ā Sample size justified
Implementation Steps:
-
Define Selection Criteria ā Relevance to problem ā Recency requirements ā Quality thresholds ā Representativeness requirements ā Sufficient volume
-
Validate Data Quality ā Accuracy checks ā Completeness verification ā Consistency validation ā Outlier detection ā Noise assessment
-
Assess Representativeness ā Demographic distribution analysis ā Comparison to target population ā Edge case coverage ā Class balance evaluation
-
Document Training Data ā Create Datasheet for Dataset ā Document collection methodology ā Record known limitations ā Specify recommended uses
Evidence: ā Training data selection documentation ā Data quality reports ā Representativeness analysis ā Datasheets for datasets
A.3.2 Bias Identification and Mitigation
Requirements: ā Bias assessment performed ā Historical bias identified ā Sampling bias evaluated ā Mitigation strategies implemented
Implementation Steps:
-
Identify Potential Biases ā Historical bias (data reflects past discrimination) ā Representation bias (underrepresented groups) ā Measurement bias (measurement method biased) ā Aggregation bias (inappropriate aggregation) ā Label bias (biased labeling)
-
Quantify Bias ā Demographic analysis of training data ā Statistical disparity assessment ā Proxy variable analysis ā Correlation with protected attributes
-
Implement Mitigation ā Re-sampling (over/under-sampling) ā Re-weighting samples ā Synthetic data generation ā Improved data collection ā Feature engineering
-
Validate Mitigation ā Re-assess bias after mitigation ā Verify fairness improvements ā Check for performance trade-offs ā Document mitigation effectiveness
Evidence: ā Bias assessment reports ā Mitigation strategy documentation ā Post-mitigation validation results
A.3.3 Training Data Versioning and Traceability
Requirements: ā Training datasets versioned ā Lineage tracked ā Changes documented ā Reproducibility ensured
Implementation Steps:
-
Implement Versioning ā Use data versioning tool (DVC, etc.) ā Semantic versioning for datasets ā Immutable dataset storage ā Version tags with metadata
-
Track Lineage ā Document data sources ā Record transformations ā Link to model versions ā Maintain audit trail
-
Ensure Reproducibility ā Snapshot datasets at model training time ā Document preprocessing steps ā Version transformation code ā Record random seeds
Evidence: ā Versioned training datasets ā Lineage documentation ā Reproducibility validation
ISO 42001 Reference: A.3
A.4 MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Objective: Develop AI models with appropriate controls and documentation
A.4.1 Model Design and Selection
Requirements: ā Model design documented ā Algorithm selection justified ā Alternatives considered ā Design approved
Implementation Steps:
-
Document Design ā Create Model Design Document ā Define problem formulation ā Specify input/output ā Define success metrics ā Identify constraints
-
Select Algorithm ā Evaluate multiple algorithms ā Consider interpretability requirements ā Assess performance requirements ā Evaluate resource constraints ā Document selection rationale
-
Design Review ā Peer review of design ā Domain expert review ā Security review ā Privacy review ā Approval from technical lead
Evidence: ā Model Design Documents ā Algorithm comparison analysis ā Design review approvals
A.4.2 Model Training and Optimization
Requirements: ā Reproducible training process ā Experiments tracked ā Hyperparameters optimized ā Overfitting prevented
Implementation Steps:
-
Set Up Development Environment ā Secure development infrastructure ā Version control (Git) ā Experiment tracking (MLflow, W&B, etc.) ā Development guidelines documented
-
Implement Reproducibility ā Set random seeds ā Lock dependencies ā Version code, data, and models ā Document environment
-
Track Experiments ā Log all experiments ā Record hyperparameters ā Track metrics ā Save artifacts ā Enable comparison
-
Optimize Model ā Define search space ā Use systematic optimization (grid, random, Bayesian) ā Validate on separate set ā Apply early stopping ā Prevent overfitting
Evidence: ā Training code in version control ā Experiment tracking logs ā Reproducibility validation
A.4.3 Model Explainability
Requirements: ā Explainability mechanisms implemented ā Global interpretability provided ā Local explanations available ā Explanations validated
Implementation Steps:
-
Implement Global Explainability ā Feature importance calculated ā SHAP summary plots ā Partial dependence plots ā Model behavior documentation
-
Implement Local Explainability ā SHAP values for individual predictions ā LIME or equivalent ā Counterfactual explanations ā Example-based explanations
-
Create User-Facing Explanations ā Plain language templates ā Visualizations ā Confidence indicators ā Uncertainty communication
-
Validate Explanations ā Fidelity testing (explanations match model) ā Consistency testing ā User comprehension testing ā Domain expert review
Evidence: ā Explainability implementation code ā Example explanations ā User testing results ā Validation reports
A.4.4 Model Documentation
Requirements: ā Model cards created ā Technical documentation complete ā Limitations documented ā Usage guidelines provided
Implementation Steps:
-
Create Model Card ā Model details section ā Intended use section ā Training data section ā Performance metrics ā Fairness analysis ā Ethical considerations ā Limitations ā Recommendations
-
Technical Documentation ā Architecture details ā Hyperparameters ā Training procedure ā Code references ā Dependencies
-
Usage Guidelines ā Intended use cases ā Out-of-scope uses ā User requirements ā Input specifications ā Output interpretation
Evidence: ā Model cards for all production models ā Technical documentation ā Usage guidelines
ISO 42001 Reference: A.4
A.5 MODEL EVALUATION AND VALIDATION
Objective: Verify models meet performance, fairness, and robustness requirements
A.5.1 Model Testing
Requirements: ā Comprehensive testing performed ā Test set evaluation completed ā Cross-validation conducted ā Test results documented
Implementation Steps:
-
Performance Testing ā Hold-out test set evaluation ā Primary metric calculated ā Secondary metrics calculated ā Statistical significance tested ā Confidence intervals calculated ā Comparison to baseline
-
Cross-Validation ā K-fold cross-validation (K=5 or 10) ā Performance across folds ā Stability assessment ā Mean and std dev calculated
-
Temporal Validation ā Performance over time periods ā Recent vs historical data ā Trend analysis
-
Segment Analysis ā Performance by customer segment ā Performance by product category ā Performance by region ā No unacceptable degradation
Evidence: ā Test results reports ā Cross-validation results ā Segment performance analysis
A.5.2 Independent Validation
Requirements: ā Independent validation for high-risk systems ā Validation team separate from development ā Validation report created ā Issues identified and addressed
Implementation Steps:
-
Establish Validation Team ā Independent from development (required) ā ML engineering expertise ā Domain expertise ā Fairness expertise
-
Conduct Validation ā Review design and implementation ā Re-run tests independently ā Validate data quality ā Assess fairness ā Test robustness ā Review documentation
-
Document Findings ā Validation report created ā Issues identified ā Recommendations provided ā Acceptance recommendation
-
Address Issues ā Remediation plan for issues ā Re-validation if needed ā Final approval
Evidence: ā Validation reports ā Independence attestation ā Remediation documentation
A.5.3 Performance Assessment
Requirements: ā Performance metrics appropriate ā Acceptance criteria defined ā Performance meets requirements ā Performance across groups validated
Implementation Steps:
-
Define Metrics ā Task-appropriate metrics selected ā Business-relevant metrics included ā Baseline performance established
-
Set Acceptance Criteria ā Minimum performance thresholds ā Comparison to baseline ā Statistical significance requirements ā Fairness thresholds
-
Evaluate Performance ā Calculate all metrics ā Compare to acceptance criteria ā Assess statistical significance ā Evaluate across demographics
-
Document Results ā Performance summary ā Comparison to requirements ā Recommendation (approve/reject)
Evidence: ā Performance evaluation reports ā Acceptance criteria documentation ā Approval decisions
A.5.4 Fairness Evaluation
Requirements: ā Fairness metrics defined ā Performance across groups assessed ā Fairness thresholds met ā Bias mitigation implemented if needed
Implementation Steps:
-
Define Fairness Metrics ā Demographic parity ā Equal opportunity ā Equalized odds ā Calibration ā Predictive parity
-
Assess Fairness ā Performance by protected groups ā Calculate fairness metrics ā Identify disparities ā Analyze root causes
-
Implement Mitigation (if needed) ā Re-sampling ā Re-weighting ā Fairness constraints ā Post-processing calibration
-
Validate Mitigation ā Re-assess fairness ā Verify improvements ā Check performance impact ā Document results
-
Set Thresholds ā Maximum disparity: [5%] recommended ā Document threshold rationale ā Verify compliance
Evidence: ā Fairness evaluation reports ā Group performance comparisons ā Mitigation documentation (if applicable) ā Threshold compliance verification
ISO 42001 Reference: A.5
A.6 DEPLOYMENT AND USE
Objective: Deploy AI systems safely with appropriate controls
A.6.1 Deployment Planning and Control
Requirements: ā Deployment plan created ā Readiness assessment completed ā Approval obtained ā Phased deployment strategy
Implementation Steps:
-
Create Deployment Plan ā Deployment strategy selected (shadow/canary/blue-green) ā Timeline and milestones ā Resource requirements ā Rollback procedures ā Success criteria
-
Readiness Assessment ā Complete deployment readiness checklist ā Technical readiness verified ā Governance readiness confirmed ā Documentation complete ā Training completed
-
Obtain Approvals ā Low-risk: Technical Lead ā Medium-risk: Department Head ā High-risk: AI Governance Board
-
Execute Deployment ā Follow deployment plan ā Monitor closely during rollout ā Validate at each phase ā Address issues promptly
Evidence: ā Deployment plans ā Readiness assessments ā Approval documentation ā Deployment logs
A.6.2 User Training and Awareness
Requirements: ā User training completed ā Usage guidelines provided ā Limitations communicated ā Feedback mechanisms established
Implementation Steps:
-
Develop Training Materials ā User guides ā Video tutorials ā FAQs ā Quick reference guides
-
Conduct Training ā Training sessions ā Hands-on practice ā Q&A sessions ā Competency assessment
-
Communicate Limitations ā Clear documentation of limitations ā Out-of-scope uses identified ā Edge cases explained ā When to escalate
-
Establish Feedback ā Feedback channels ā Issue reporting process ā Feature requests ā User satisfaction surveys
Evidence: ā Training materials ā Training completion records ā User guides ā Feedback mechanisms
A.6.3 Operational Procedures
Requirements: ā Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) documented ā Human oversight mechanisms implemented ā Override procedures defined ā Escalation processes established
Implementation Steps:
-
Document SOPs ā Daily operations procedures ā Weekly review procedures ā Monthly assessment procedures ā Incident response procedures
-
Implement Human Oversight ā Define oversight model (HITL/HOTL/HOOTL) ā Implement oversight interfaces ā Train operators ā Monitor oversight effectiveness
-
Define Override Procedures ā Override authority matrix ā Override process documented ā Documentation requirements ā Override monitoring
-
Establish Escalation ā Escalation levels defined ā Escalation triggers identified ā Escalation procedures documented ā Response time SLAs
Evidence: ā Standard Operating Procedures ā Human oversight implementation ā Override and escalation procedures ā Runbooks
A.6.4 Change Management
Requirements: ā Change management process defined ā Changes approved before implementation ā Impact assessment performed ā Changes documented
Implementation Steps:
-
Define Change Process ā Change request procedure ā Impact assessment requirements ā Testing requirements ā Approval workflow ā Communication plan
-
Implement Change Controls ā Change request system ā Change advisory board (for major changes) ā Testing environments ā Rollback procedures
-
Document Changes ā Change log maintained ā Configuration management database (CMDB) ā Version control ā Release notes
Evidence: ā Change management procedure ā Change requests and approvals ā Change log ā Release documentation
ISO 42001 Reference: A.6
A.7 MONITORING AND CONTINUAL IMPROVEMENT
Objective: Ensure ongoing performance and continuous improvement
A.7.1 Performance Monitoring
Requirements: ā Continuous performance monitoring ā Metrics tracked and trended ā Dashboards created ā Alerts configured
Implementation Steps:
-
Define Monitoring Metrics ā Performance metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, etc.) ā System metrics (latency, throughput, error rate) ā Business metrics (user satisfaction, business impact) ā Fairness metrics
-
Implement Monitoring Infrastructure ā Monitoring tools deployed ā Data collection configured ā Dashboards created ā Alerting rules defined
-
Set Alert Thresholds ā Critical: Performance <[90%], Error rate >[1%] ā High: Performance <[92%], Latency >[500ms] ā Medium: Performance <[94%] ā Review and adjust based on experience
-
Monitor Continuously ā Real-time monitoring ā Daily reviews ā Weekly trend analysis ā Monthly comprehensive reviews
Evidence: ā Monitoring dashboards ā Alert configurations ā Monitoring reports ā Alert response logs
A.7.2 Data Quality Monitoring
Requirements: ā Input data quality monitored ā Data drift detected ā Quality issues addressed ā Data pipeline health tracked
Implementation Steps:
-
Implement Data Quality Checks ā Schema validation ā Null rate monitoring ā Range validation ā Type validation ā Outlier detection
-
Monitor Data Drift ā Distribution monitoring ā PSI calculation (Population Stability Index) ā Drift alerts (threshold: PSI > 0.2) ā Root cause analysis for drift
-
Track Data Pipeline Health ā Pipeline execution monitoring ā Data freshness checks ā Volume monitoring ā Error rate tracking
Evidence: ā Data quality dashboards ā Drift detection reports ā Data pipeline monitoring ā Issue resolution logs
A.7.3 Bias and Fairness Monitoring
Requirements: ā Fairness metrics monitored continuously ā Bias drift detected ā Fairness issues addressed promptly ā Regular fairness audits
Implementation Steps:
-
Implement Fairness Monitoring ā Continuous fairness metric calculation ā Demographic group performance tracking ā Disparate impact monitoring ā Fairness dashboards
-
Set Fairness Thresholds ā Maximum disparity: [5%] across groups ā Alert if threshold exceeded ā Investigation required for violations
-
Conduct Regular Audits ā High-risk systems: Quarterly fairness audit ā Medium-risk systems: Semi-annual audit ā Low-risk systems: Annual audit ā Document findings and actions
-
Address Fairness Issues ā Investigation procedure ā Remediation plan ā Re-validation ā Communication to stakeholders
Evidence: ā Fairness monitoring dashboards ā Audit reports ā Remediation documentation
A.7.4 Incident Management
Requirements: ā Incident detection and reporting ā Investigation and remediation ā Post-incident reviews ā Lessons learned captured
Implementation Steps:
-
Establish Incident Process ā Incident classification (P0-P3) ā Reporting procedures ā Investigation procedures ā Response procedures ā Communication procedures
-
Implement Incident Detection ā Automated alerting ā User reporting channels ā Regular reviews ā External notifications
-
Investigation and Response ā Immediate triage ā Containment actions ā Root cause analysis ā Remediation implementation ā Verification
-
Post-Incident Activities ā Post-incident review meeting ā Timeline reconstruction ā Lessons learned documentation ā Preventive measures identified ā Policy/procedure updates
Evidence: ā Incident response plan ā Incident reports ā Post-incident reviews ā Lessons learned documentation
A.7.5 Continual Improvement
Requirements: ā Improvement opportunities identified ā Improvements implemented ā Effectiveness measured ā Best practices captured and shared
Implementation Steps:
-
Identify Improvements ā From incidents and issues ā From monitoring and analysis ā From user feedback ā From audits and reviews ā From industry best practices
-
Prioritize Improvements ā Impact assessment ā Effort estimation ā Risk reduction ā Priority ranking
-
Implement Improvements ā Improvement project plan ā Resource allocation ā Implementation ā Testing and validation
-
Measure Effectiveness ā Before/after metrics ā Improvement verification ā Stakeholder feedback ā Lessons learned
-
Share Best Practices ā Internal knowledge sharing ā Documentation updates ā Training updates ā Industry contribution
Evidence: ā Improvement tracking log ā Improvement implementation documentation ā Effectiveness measurement reports ā Best practices documentation
ISO 42001 Reference: A.7
IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP
Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)
Priority: Critical foundational controls
ā A.1: AI System Inventory
- Complete inventory of all AI systems
- Classify risk levels
- Assign owners
ā A.2: Data Governance Framework
- Establish governance organization
- Define data quality standards
- Implement access controls
ā AI Policy
- Draft and approve AI policy
- Communicate to organization
- Initial training
ā Governance Structure
- Establish AI Governance Board
- Establish AI Ethics Committee
- Define roles and responsibilities
Deliverables:
- AI System Inventory
- Data Governance Framework
- AI Policy (approved)
- Governance charter
Phase 2: Development Controls (Months 4-6)
Priority: Controls for AI development lifecycle
ā A.3: Training Data Management
- Implement data quality processes
- Establish bias assessment procedures
- Implement data versioning
ā A.4: Model Development Standards
- Create model design templates
- Implement experiment tracking
- Establish documentation standards
- Implement explainability
ā A.5: Validation and Testing
- Create validation framework
- Establish fairness testing procedures
- Implement independent validation (high-risk)
Deliverables:
- Training data procedures
- Development standards and templates
- Validation framework
- Model card template
Phase 3: Deployment and Operations (Months 7-9)
Priority: Controls for deployment and operations
ā A.6: Deployment Controls
- Define deployment strategies
- Create readiness checklists
- Implement human oversight
- Establish change management
ā A.7.1-7.2: Monitoring Infrastructure
- Deploy monitoring tools
- Create dashboards
- Configure alerts
- Implement data quality monitoring
Deliverables:
- Deployment procedures
- Human oversight implementation
- Monitoring dashboards
- Standard Operating Procedures
Phase 4: Monitoring and Improvement (Months 10-12)
Priority: Continuous monitoring and improvement
ā A.7.3-7.4: Advanced Monitoring
- Implement fairness monitoring
- Establish incident management
- Conduct regular audits
ā A.7.5: Improvement Process
- Establish improvement tracking
- Implement feedback loops
- Conduct retrospectives
ā Compliance Validation
- Internal audit
- Gap remediation
- External certification (optional)
Deliverables:
- Complete monitoring implementation
- Incident response procedures
- Audit reports
- Certification (if applicable)
QUICK START CHECKLIST
Week 1-2: Assessment ā Inventory existing AI systems ā Assess current state vs ISO 42001 ā Identify critical gaps ā Prioritize implementation
Month 1: Foundation ā Establish governance structure ā Draft AI policy ā Create AI system inventory ā Assign roles and responsibilities
Month 2-3: Core Controls ā Implement data governance framework ā Establish development standards ā Create validation framework ā Approve and communicate policy
Month 4-6: Operationalization ā Implement all development controls ā Deploy monitoring infrastructure ā Establish operational procedures ā Train teams
Month 7-12: Optimization ā Monitor and refine controls ā Conduct internal audits ā Continuous improvement ā Prepare for certification
SUCCESS CRITERIA
Implementation Success: ā All Annex A controls implemented ā Evidence documented for each control ā Controls operating effectively ā Compliance verified through internal audit ā Team trained and competent ā Stakeholders satisfied
Operational Success: ā AI systems meet performance requirements ā Fairness thresholds maintained ā Incidents managed effectively ā Continuous improvement demonstrated ā Regulatory compliance maintained ā Stakeholder trust established
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive checklist provides a practical roadmap for implementing ISO 42001 controls. Adapt it to your organization's specific needs, risk profile, and maturity level.
Key Success Factors:
- Executive Commitment: Leadership support essential
- Adequate Resources: People, budget, tools
- Phased Approach: Start with critical controls
- Practical Implementation: Fit controls to context
- Continuous Improvement: Iterate and enhance
- Cultural Change: Embed responsible AI in culture
Remember: ISO 42001 is a journey, not a destination. Focus on continuous improvement and building a sustainable AI management system.
Module 3 Complete: You now have comprehensive guidance on implementing AI controls, from policy frameworks to operational procedures. Continue to Module 4 for advanced topics and certification preparation.